ISSUES IN ASIAN AND ASIAN AMERICAN CHRISTIANITY
The Rev. James Kodera, Ph. D.
Note: The following is a response-reflection
from The Rev. Dr.
James Kodera, professor at Wellesley
College, Massachusetts and former president of the Episcopal Asiamerica Ministry
Council to the Panel Discussion on Asian American Theologizing found somewhere
in this blogsite. – Fred Vergara
Dear Colleagues,
I have
read a recent talk given at Columbia Theological Seminary by the Rev. Dr. Fred
Vergara, Missioner for Asiamerica Ministry of the Episcopal Church. He was good
enough to send the full text of the same talk. He invited the Episcopal
Asiamerica Ministry community to offer our own thoughts on the topic of
discussion at Columbia Seminary. I would like to accept the invitation.
I offer
my reflections in an itemized format in the hope that my contribution might
elicit further responses from a variety of Asian and Asian American
communities, especially those with Christian commitments. What I offer here is
selective, and certainly not exhaustive, intended to move the discussion
forward.
1. Christianity in
Asia and Asian Christians:
Christians
of Asian heritage are often viewed in North America as "new comers,"
as products of the work of missionaries from Western Europe and North America.
It is indeed true that so many Asian Christians were schooled in institutions
of higher education founded, or inspired, by missionaries from the West.
Directly inspired by the Protestant missionary movement, started by a handful
students at Williams College, in the nineteenth century, many missionaries went
to Asia to propagate Christianity in the second half of the nineteenth century.
Common assumption then was the no one could be "civilized" without
being Christian; "Christian" referring to certain Protestant
traditions, later known as "Mainline Protestant" denominations.
Methodist, Presbyterian, Congregational, American Baptist, and so a lesser
extent Episcopal, were among them. They went to Hawaii, China, Japan, Korea and
Thailand, where the leaders of these institutions of higher learning remain
grateful today for the work of the missionaries. United Kingdom, Holland and
Scandinavia also sent their missionaries during this period.
And
yet, we should also remember that, centuries before the Western European and
North American missionaries, there were Christian communities in Asia. Put
differently, we could say that both some of the oldest and the largest
Christian churches are in Asia. Look at churches planted by Saint Thomas in Kerala,
India. St. Mary's Syrian Orthodox Church in Alleppey, Kerala, India, was
founded in 54 CE by Thomas. The church remains vital today. It is one of
"seven and a half" Churches planted by Thomas before he was killed,
martyred, in Chennai in 72 CE. The largest parish church in membership in the
whole world today is Yoido Full Gospel Church in Seoul with upwards of 900,000
members. While many churches in South Korea were planted by American
missionaries, especially by Horace Allen and Horace Underwood of the
Presbyterian Church and Thomas Appenzeller of the Methodist Church, the
strategies for mission and ministry have not been simply to copy what they
learned from the missionaries. The founder of Yoido Full Gospel Church received
no formal theological education, except for a brief study in Korea. He knew
that the future of Christianity for the Korean had to affirm the native Korean
traditions, especially the Confucian respect for learning and the vitality of
Shamanism, especially Shamanesses, deeply rooted in the Korean folk tradition.
Yoido Full Gospel Church is a product of the Korean Christians rejecting the
Western missionary model, and infusing the native Korean traditions as part of
a uniquely Korean Christian movement. Other Asian countries have not followed
the same. Japan, for example, continued to propagate the missionary versions of
the Christian Gospel, although there were some notable attempts at
"indigenizing" Christianity. Among them are Uchimura Kanzo's "No
Church Christianity" and Kitamori Kazo's "Pain of God Theology."
Both appealed largely to a small group of intellectuals with strong Western
leanings. More recently, Koyama Kosuke's unique theology, developed while
teaching in Southeast Asia and at Union Seminary in New York, appealed to Westerners
and North Americans, but not to the Japanese. In Japan, appealing to the
pro-Western intellectuals did not result in planting the Christian Gospel among
the masses.
2. Why is Asian
American Studies important not only for Asian Americans but also for Asians:
It was
in the crucible of the late 1960's when the term "Asian American" was
coined by the students in the Bay Area. The impetus that contributed to the
coinage of “Asian Americans” in the late 1960’s in the Bay Area included not
only their opposition to the US involvement in the civil war in Indochina, but
their awareness of the rise of certain Asian countries in the world. Japan’s
rise as a technological power and China’s rise as a political power under Mao
were among the reasons. They found strong affinity with the opposition to the
“Vietnam War” by the Vietnamese Buddhist monk, Thich Nhat Hanh. To them, the
war was not “Vietnam War,” but “American War,” for it was the US who was
fighting their war against the Communists in Vietnam.
The Federal
government of the United States adopted "Asian and Pacific Island
American" as a new demographic category in the 1990 US Census. Less than 1
million in 1960, they increased to more than 7 million in 1990. "Asian
American Americans, separated from the “Pacific Islander Americans” in the 2010
US Census, today are the fastest growing segment of the US population. While
this was happening, Asians in Asia remain divided by language and history.
Colonialism is a very big factor, contributing to the division. While many
Asian countries were colonized by Europeans powers, including the British
(India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Burma), the Spanish (the Philippines), the French
("Indochina") and the Dutch (Indonesia), the most savage colonial
oppression in many parts of Asia were by the Japanese. Japan first sought to
occupy the Korean Peninsula in 1592. After Japan's victory over Imperial China
in 1895 and over Imperial Russia a decade later, Japan was given by the
international community (Portsmouth Conference of 1906) the Korean Peninsula as
its colony. Asians’ struggles have not been just with European powers, but
within Asia, especially with the Japanese. Unless peace and reconciliation is
achieved among Asians, Asian Americans cannot come together as a “Pan Asian”
community with a common history and aspirations.
3. The myths of Asian
Americans as “Model Minority”:
Since
the publication of William Peterson’s article in the New York Times Magazine in
1966, in which he coined the term “model minority,” referring to East Asian
Americans, not only the larger North American society but Asian Americans
themselves have assumed that they have “made it,” especially in education and
employment. Today, the median income of Asian Americans is higher than that of
other Americans, including Euro Americans. Today, Indian Americans, who
comprise 1% of the US population, are the wealthiest ethnic group in the US,
surpassing Jewish Americans. This statistic compounded the stereotype of Asian
Americans as well educated and wealthy. And yet, the poorest Americans are also
Asian American, namely the Hmong Americans, most of whom came to the US as
refugees in the aftermath of the “Vietnam War” that ended in 1975. They also
have among the highest rate of domestic violence in the US. How can we group
all Asian Americans, as if they were a homogeneous group?
4. Aspirations of Asian
Americans, born of their forbearers’ struggles:
We must
be mindful of a number of anti-Asian legislations in US history. It started
with the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and was compounded by the Executive
Order 9066, signed by President Franklyn Roosevelt in 1942, ordering some
120,000 Japanese and Japanese Americans in the West Coast to “internment camps”
for over three years. Asians working on plantations in Hawaii and coal mines in
Wyoming, laundry and restaurant workers in San Francisco and gardeners in
Southern California were ineligible for naturalization as US citizens until the
passage of the Water McCarran Act of 1952, which effectively ended the Chinese
Exclusion Act after 70 years. But it was with a quota, less than 3,000 per
year. When we consider that Asians comprise roughly one half of the human race
then as now, the quota was extremely small. It was not until 1964 when the New
Immigration Act, envisioned by President John F. Kenney and signed by President
Lyndon B. Johnson, that the racial quota was dropped. In the new immigration
law, “refugees” were given a special consideration in their transition to the
US. As Americans of Asian heritage come together in search of a common history
and aspirations, it is essential that they know not only what happened to
Asians in American, but why. The fear of Asians becoming American was real. The
State of California passed an anti miscegenation laws against Asians in 1850.
Furthermore, only able bodied Asian men were allowed entry into the United
States through the Port of San Francisco. Women were barred, unless they were
prostitutes. California’s antimiscegenation laws were not repealed until 1948.
Given
this history, evident are the Euro Americans sentiments against Asians. Equally
noteworthy is Asians’ and Asian Americans’ complicity in the racial superiority
of people of European heritage. Reluctance to “make waves” in Asian American
communities is to keep them safe, given the history. But it is also an
expression of Asians’ deference to, if not reverence for, people of European
heritage. This is precisely the reason why Asian Americans as “model minority”
is defined in European and Euro American terms. Asian Americans who have
excelled in educational and vocational pursuits that are supposed to be
European and Euro American in origin are considered “model minority.” Asian
Americans who excel in piano and violin are “model minority.” Asian Americans
who obtain PhD in Shakespeare are “model minority.” But Asian Americans who
excel just as much in Asian art or Asian literature remain on the periphery of
North American society. They are not “model minority.” In short, racism is not
simply of Euro Americans against Asian Americans, but also among and by Asian
Americans. Racism remains a social, cultural and political reality as Asian
traits.